Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Aslett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 03:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Richard Aslett

Richard Aslett (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Insufficient notability, fails WP:RS, strong suspicion of autobiography dramatic (talk) 21:18, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment The sources - local New Zealand news sites - seem reliable enough to me. Sheffield Steel^talk_stalk 21:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Comment Yes, slight brain fade there. However, none of the references show him doing anything notable: He entered one art competition and didn't win - another one (which no longer attracts many professional artisrts) and did win. And community boards are the lowest teir of local government - members are not notable. dramatic (talk) 01:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 03:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete no assertion of ntability, despite actual mud. Johnbod (talk) 04:55, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: Not notable enough. --Helenalex (talk) 21:28, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.