Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Alan Fox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus --JForget 00:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Richard Alan Fox

Richard Alan Fox (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Seemingly non-notable. Claimed he is vice-chairman of a national organisation, and is seemingly a respected doctor, but not much to back up these claims Montchav (talk) 13:24, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Longhair\talk 17:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment, I found this asserting that he was Vice Chairman on an independent site, problem is the link itself was not valid and I had to go to Google's cache. Lankiveil (talk) 01:02, 29 December 2007 (UTC).
  • Keep this seems to highlight it for me. Twenty Years 01:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per User:Twenty Years. Also being Head of Department of a major hospital is rather more than being a respected doctor. --Bduke (talk) 05:35, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep this article about an important person at a major hospital. Stormbay (talk) 02:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:N; the only source so far produced is not independent of the subject. Jfire (talk) 03:17, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Very Weak keep 24 published papers in Web of Science, with the most cited being 70, 49, 35, 17 times. A borderline record for a medical scientist. Major hospital. but only Associate professor at the relevant university medical school. The 3rd para is a direct copyvio from the external reference. DGG (talk) 02:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC),
  • Delete. The publication record uncovered by DGG is below the borderline for me. --Crusio (talk) 10:02, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.