The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Yanksox 03:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Looks like advertising, the article doesn't satisfy WP:WEB. J Ditalk 15:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete, spamvertising. --DrTorstenHenning 17:11, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep. Doesn't look like advertising to me. (It's not a very good article at present though...) --Zundark 20:15, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete, fails WP:WEB by not having any claim to notability, let alone reliable sources for such a claim. Sandstein 05:32, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete. Who cares???? YechielMan 23:21, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.