Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Hammond

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 20:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rich Hammond

Rich Hammond (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Second half of article is a direct copy from a now obsolete website. Is the rest worth keeping ? thisisace 21:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Article as it stands does not come close to meeting WP:BIO. It's entirely possible he is just a writer for a local newspaper. i kan reed 22:29, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Does not meet WP:BIO WheelchairBoy 00:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Notability not asserted or evident. Decoratrix 00:18, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Bellito, master of all things Mac-related 00:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as failing WP:BLP - not notable, no sources, copyvio, etc. Bearian 22:10, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.