Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Dad, Poor Dad
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn by nominator, no deletion votes so far. -- nae'blis (talk) 19:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Rich Dad, Poor Dad
Blatant advertising, and the book is already discussed in the page on Robert Kiyosaki. Delete and redirect. fbb_fan 12:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It's currently the #21 bestseller on Amazon, and has led to a long series of sequels. Notable enough for Wikipedia. As far as the page being blatant advertising, that can be fixed with a few edits keeping the NPOV policy in mind. MysteryDog 14:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- This was a best-selling book; either keep or redirect to Robert Kiyosaki without deleting, I'm undecided as to which. --Metropolitan90 14:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. A bit advertise-y, but not too bad. Includes criticism section (albeit unreferenced). Apparently a bestseller per MysteryDog. Powers 14:10, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep Huge bestselling book. If the tone is wrong, that's cause for cleanup, not deletion. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - very popular book -- Lost 16:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep - speedy, if the nominator is willing to withdraw the AfD PT (s-s-s-s) 16:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment. Given the response so far, I'm willing to withdraw the AfD, with the qualification that the article could use some cleanup to improve NPOV. fbb_fan 17:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- I tried my hand at it. If you still have issues with it (and I mean this respectfully, not angrily), why don't you try an edit? PT (s-s-s-s) 19:08, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.