Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rice Boy Page

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 07:21, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rice Boy Page

Somehow related to WJOWSA (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/WJOWSA); Internet forum? Notable? I think not. Dunc|☺ 18:57, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete drini ☎ 19:00, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Well, since the creators allegedly don't want people to talk about, I think it would be morally indefensible to keep an article on it. Don't you? Delete. --Scimitar 19:39, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep So using that logic you should delete the Free Masons since they have been a secret society. You would also never add Builderburger Society.

Also members don't want the members talking about the location, but its existance is not in question.

Your logic doesn't follow. You have an article on Area 51 the government has a poorly kept secret base there. They would really rather people not talk about it, and they have purchased land to block public view. Being the government doesn't want you talking about it, the using your logic the AREA 51 entry should be deleted. User:141.157.157.100 4:26, June 6th, 2005 (EDT)

• Oh, my apologies if I was unclear. I would advise you to check the wiktionary 'facetious' or 'sarcastic'. A well-known aspect of some vanity creations is how they aren't wellknown because the members keep it a secret. As for your reasoning, Free Masons don't hide their existence, and Area 51 was built by the govt., which is representative of "the people", therefore it is created by "the people", who never have expressed their wishes that it remain a secret. If my arguments fail to convince I would vote delete as unverifiable and nonnotable. --Scimitar 21:42, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Not notable. --Tabor 20:40, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn, -- BD2412 ^talk 21:00, 2005 Jun 6 (UTC)
• Keep
• By likening the subject to Fight Club the article itself helpfully tells us that the subject is too secret for Wikipedia and that therefore the purported "forum guidelines", estimates of membership, and claims to famous members that comprise the rest of the article, must be pure invention. Delete. Uncle G 00:22, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)
• Keep Its verfyable and real. Some people need to learn hwo to use things such as google and altavista search.
• Delete - Not notable. The article is pretty humourous though... --Chill Pill Bill 01:08, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Not notable. carmeld1 01:41, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Since they seek anonymity, let us help them. Denni☯ 03:39, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)
• Delete. I post on that forum and I don't see the value. AKADriver 21:39, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)
  • KEEP I'm a member of the RBP too. AKADriver you coming up to the next autocross? I will have finished filming Car & Driver TV and will have the car we build for the Super Four Challenge there.--71Demon 02:12, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.