Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reynols

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete — Caknuck 21:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reynols

Reynols (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Absolutely no assertion of notability since 2005, and when I prodded the page, the template was simply removed again without any improvement to the article. It's not so much an issue of needing citations, as needing a reason to have an article in the first place. Yeanold Viskersenn 07:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:BIO. No secondary-source citations, no assertion of notability.Ryoung122 07:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This may even be a hoax. Either way, it's not significant. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 20:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.