The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted per CSD A1. Despite lots of text, the composer failed to establish a context for this theory outside of his own head. Xoloz 14:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
This article is nothing more than one individual's personal philosphy. It is original research. It is vanity. It is not notable. Deli nk 13:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete per all of the above reasons. No external reliable sources, and admits to being at least somewhat of a neologism (2005) to boot. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:42, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.