Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolution music canada

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete (5d/2k). Mindmatrix 16:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Revolution music canada

NN. http://www.google.com.au/search?q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.revolutionmusic.net%2F shows 11 sites linking to the group in question. Josh Parris#: 05:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy keep http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&q=%22revolution+music+canada%22&btnG=Search&meta= shows 778 pages linking to the group in question. It has now been edited to better explain it's importance, including involvement with national releases and competitions which is included as a guideline for music articles Revmusic 02:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete truly nn. Eusebeus 10:30, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

• OK Then, but I figured that an article on an independent non-profit music collective would fit. Revmusic 19:28, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Seems to be primarily Internet/local. That's 147 displayed hits and an Alexa rank for the website of 4,216,148. Doesn't meet WP:MUSIC. 24.17.48.241 07:08, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. -- JJay 21:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:39, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• I still think it should be kept but will stand by whatever decision is made. -- revmusic 02:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination and per anon above. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 08:27, Dec. 21, 2005

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.