Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Review: Ruth The Biblical Ghana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 22:36, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Review: Ruth The Biblical Ghana

Review of a non notable POV essay Nuttah68 08:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete OR, nn. All I can really say about this article is... what? -- Kicking222 17:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I would suggest merging into History of Ghana if anything was salvagable, but the author couldn't even spell Kwame Nkrumah's name right. The Disco King 18:42, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Barneyboo (Talk) 18:43, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
• WOW that's horrible!! I feel like BJAODNing it, but people would get offended... This is close to patent nonsense, beginning in the first paragraph where Ghana "migrated to its present location in west africa in search of an oasis." In any case, delete. Grandmasterka 01:30, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
• Well it is about the psychic evaluation on Ghana as of now and then off in past and the future, slip of fingers the keyboard is slippery, auther. It is not my tongue. Don't delete

per nom. --TorriTorri 02:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - For the above reasons. Picaroon9288 00:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.