Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reverse Dibs

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was delete. FCYTravis 6 July 2005 06:21 (UTC)

[edit] Reverse Dibs

Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Neologism/original research by analogy with dibs concerning the old childhood concept of "cooties". — Gwalla | Talk 29 June 2005 06:16 (UTC)

• Dibs on deleting this original research. JamesBurns 29 June 2005 06:40 (UTC)
• Darn, you got dibs. Author claims girls don't have cooties: unverifiable. Barno 29 June 2005 14:10 (UTC)
• Delete, original research. --bainer (talk) 29 June 2005 14:20 (UTC)
• Delete: Private game. "Why would anyone want to touch a girl's butt? Don't you know that's where cooties come from?" -- Bart Simpson. Geogre 29 June 2005 18:23 (UTC)
• Delete - if I've understood correctly, WP reverse dibs this article. I may have misunderstood - I'm just focussed on NOT wanting this article. At least I learnt what cooties are. -Splash June 29, 2005 21:57 (UTC)
• Delete but list at Bad jokes and other deleted nonsense .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish June 30, 2005 15:01 (UTC)
• Delete Silly nonsense. Please note Mothperson may accuse this vote of being a sockpuppet vote. - ConeyCyclone 30 June 2005 19:27 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.