Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reversal of Man
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. · Katefan0(scribble) 03:11, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Reversal of Man
Not notable. brenneman(t)(c) 06:29, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
- Very weak keep since they have an allmusic page (relatively bare) and 2 releases, not sure of the notability of both record labels though. --TM (talk) 08:32, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
A friend of mine let me borrow one of their albums today, I had never heard of them. Maybe he knows something about the band and can add to the page to make it less lame.
-
- More eyeballs needed. I don't feel comfortable actioning a divided debate with so little participation. -Splash 00:29, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep - there is a biography on allmusic.com [1] — Stevey7788 (talk) 03:23, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- Weak delete unless there is something more to be added, I don't think that they quite pass WP:MUSIC. --Apyule 05:34, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: Do not delete because of the worthiness of the band. Delete for substub. The band could have an article. However, this is not an article. It breaks down as "X is Y. Records include (ONE). Maybe this. Maybe." That's not even minimal for a stub, as the reader learns that the author has one of their records, knows they're from a state, and that's all. Geogre 12:39, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Being on allmusic.com is not a criterion for notability under WP:MUSIC. Allmusic simply makes it easier to find out whether the band does meet notability standards. -- Last Malthusian 15:57, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Not very notable, at all.Voice of All (talk) 17:57, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per VOA. freestylefrappe 02:21, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.