Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retropolis

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 19:18, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Retropolis

This looks like Patent Nonsense to me - but I could be wrong. Jeff Knaggs|Talk 08:11, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• The end of the article says it all "There is no real life retropolis. If anyone discovers one, expand this article." Delete. Mgm|^(talk) 09:26, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Believe it or not, "retropolis" gets an astounding 38,800 Google hits! But none of them seem to be about what's being referred to in this article. I'd say delete as likely neologism unless more evidence is presented. Starblind 09:41, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism Gazpacho 09:54, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. Jayjg | (Talk) 17:09, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: neologism not in circulation. Wile E. Heresiarch 21:56, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• "Alot of locals are sedimental". Does that mean they stack up on top of each other? Delete as nonsense, as well as a neologism. RickK 22:36, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Megan1967 01:36, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, I wish I could make up a word. --Deathphoenix 04:20, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• There you have your real life retroplis. Vasco

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.