Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restoration Lullaby

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 02:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Restoration Lullaby

Restoration Lullaby (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable album by non-notable artist who is also the author of the article. Speedy tag was removed without comment by an anon IP. --Finngall ^talk 00:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

• delete nn. `'Míkka>t 00:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete- has no substantial content, references and a unremarkable artist.  Atyndall93 | talk  01:02, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete Speedy templates should never (or rarely) be removed without comment. At minimum, Replace speedy tag. Thinboy00 @098, i.e. 01:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--Berig (talk) 17:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 18:00, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.