Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Restitution Transfer and Recoupment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Restitution Transfer and Recoupment

This is some libertarian's pet concept, with a grand total of 4 unique google hits including Wikipedia [1], excluding Wikipedia it gets nothing. It seems to be a model for a private police force and legal system, although it's hard to be sure: the article is written in technical legal language and a listy format. As far as I can see, 'RTR' has never been put into practice or discussed in any published work. In short, this article is original research, unverifiable and non-notable. I have also prodded the principal contributor's other main project Las Portadas for deletion as a non-notable proposed micronation. Nydas 11:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NOR.--Húsönd 15:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this is too must original research, and Wikipedia is not a soapbox.-- danntm ^T _C 21:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per above. --Richard 04:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as copyvio. "Permission granted by the patentholder and noted on original publication." is meaningless. Permission could only be granted by the copyright holder. (Also delete as WP:OR.)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.