Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reskin Theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn, information on article merged to Barbara Reskin. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reskin Theory

Reskin Theory (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

• change to speedy keep, nom withdrawn. Redirect to Barbara Reskin. Dlohcierekim 23:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy tagged as advert. I declined because I cannot assess subject's notability. It may just need a rewrite. Subject's works are the main source for the article Don't know which way to go with this, so AfD. Looks like ad or OR. Dlohcierekim 22:07, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as advertising. "Reskin Theory" gets zero hits on Google. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy close, article has been redirected to Barbara Reskin. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 23:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, but article may be salvagable - redirection noted. Michaelbusch 22:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Creator has been attempting a rewrite. I have requested verifiable sources. Dlohcierekim 22:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

• Hold off on the speedy deletion I'm working with the article creator, Krstn4 (talk · contribs) to morph some of the content here into an article on Barbara Reskin. — Scientizzle 23:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.