Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Residorm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete - G7 - blanked by author. — ERcheck (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Residorm

WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A DICTIONARY! How many dictionary definitions that are probably hoaxes anyway will have to be deleted before the world works this out? Blood red sandman 16:18, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as soon as possible (Note that I don't think the article could be speedied, but it should be, anyway.) WP:NFT covers this one. A single Google hit for "residorm", which is a Xanga blog. This isn't even worth a mention in, much less a merge into, the one university in which this term may or may not actually exist. -- Kicking222 16:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• The author has blanked the article, which means this can now be speedily deleted per CSD G7. -- Merope 17:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Ah, good. I have nominated for speedy deletion - Blood red sandman 17:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete ST47 17:33, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete deserves speedy --Mecanismo | Talk 18:00, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.