The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. DS 15:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
No references, possible hoax but no evidence of notability even if it is genuine. Handful of GHits, but not obvious that these relate to the same concept. Warning: the content of the article is somewhat unpleasant to read. Kim Dent-Brown(Talk to me) 15:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy Delete per nom. NN. --Tagishsimon(talk) 15:18, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.