Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research study on transplants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:15, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Research study on transplants

Research study on transplants (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Essay on organ transplants. Comes down to a content fork. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:42, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

• Comment. What a mess. I tagged it for wikify and verify. Bearian (talk) 20:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
• Strong delete Content fork/essay, reads almost like a copy & paste job, composed almost entirely of original research. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Student essay. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 10:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Original research, unstated UK focus -- I fear this isn't salvageable. Espresso Addict (talk) 11:22, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete'. Originally researched essay.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 11:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per Espresso Addict RogueNinja_talk 08:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - So far it is OR plus POV with statements like '"Scientists are “playing God” . . .' Mattisse 22:16, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.