Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Research rapture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Research rapture

alleged pop culture term, should be transwikied to Wiktionary if kept. Google hits only show the term used casually on blogs, mostly due to one NYT review of Jimmy Carter's novel (review quoted here). Certainly original research at this point, and more of a definition anyway. Marysunshine 04:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete nn internet meme. --djrobgordon 04:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:WINAD, not really notable. Sandstein 05:18, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as no sources cited for popular usage of the term. Blogs and Usenet posts shouldn't be used as primary or secondary sources for articles.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:14, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Ted 15:12, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.