Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of Europe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete, per WP:NOR Madchester 06:21, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Republic of Europe
Delete. To have an article about "Republic of Europe", only to say that such a thing doesn't exist... Many things don't exist, should we have them all in Wikipedia? Aris Katsaris 23:49, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom. Can we add in the page that links here for no reason Republic of the European Union which is created also just to make the point it also doesn't exist?Obina 00:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, and delete the redirect Obina mentioned too -- Astrokey44|talk 00:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both as per nom. CalJW 01:03, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 01:43, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both. —simpatico hi 05:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both. Mr. Know-It-All 06:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, utterly pointless. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 09:24, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Redirect to European Federation. Robin Johnson 10:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)- Redirect to a new, merged Federal Europe article as per my suggestion on Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/European_Federation. Robin Johnson 10:05, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. European Federation is full of original research also: The pivotal function of the European Federation is to allow the preservation of the national characteristics of European nations. Anyone want to nominate it? —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-25 11:12Z
- Delete per nom or make it into a disambiguation page or possibly redirect to European Union. Schlockading 04:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both. Trying to correct a misunderstanding which isn't widely prevalent is no reason for inclusion on Wikipedia. —Gabbe 21:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.