Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Representative Party of Ontario

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus, article is kept - Liberatore(T) 14:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Representative Party of Ontario

Wikipedia isn't free web space or a crystal ball. Non-notable. Delete Ardenn 01:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Per nom. ILovEPlankton 02:00, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - not notable (yet). - Richardcavell 02:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, NN, good luck, but it'll take a while --Deville (Talk) 03:51, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. I looked them up, and they are in the process of being registered with Elections Ontario; I think that makes then notable. If they don't field anyone in the next election I might change my mind. Arctic Gnome 04:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wait until they field an actual candidate and/or get some press coverage. --Saforrest 05:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
    • They fielded a candidate against John Tory in the 2005 by-election. CJCurrie 03:01, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete until they become notable. OhNoitsJamieTalk 06:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 07:22, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per Ohnoitsjamie --Mets501talk 18:37, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, or alternately merge into Reform Party of Ontario. The Representative Party has actually been around for a few years, and they've "unofficially" fielded a candidate in a by-election; also, the party is a successor to the Reform League of Ontario (aka the "Independent Reformers"). They may not have official status yet, but they do exist and are already a real (if peripheral) force in Ontario politics. CJCurrie 02:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep -- Wikipedia has lots of articles on unregistered political parties. There is no reason why this should be different. Wikipedia is not paper -- one of the great things about Wikipedia is that it has room for obscure political movements like this one. After all, it has room for articles on minor fictional characters in Star Wars and Harry Potter. Ground Zero | t 18:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.