Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renetto (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Coredesat 02:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Renetto (3rd nomination)

Renetto (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

YouTube personality. Deletion review couldn't decide whether new sources are sufficient to overrule the prior AfD's (1, 2), so the caravan moves here. Procedural listing, I have no opinion. ~ trialsanderrors 03:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak keep The sources, while not primarily about him, are sufficient to support the stub. Three of the five references are more recent than the second AFD, making me believe that this individual is becoming increasingly notable, and we will have an article on him sooner or later. I think the time is now. GRBerry 05:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, meets all relevant standards, and has for a while. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:12, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: The links check out; I can't see any particular grounds upon which to delete. RGTraynor 16:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep He is one of the most important people on YouTube, there are articles of several people from YouTube I never heard of so if we write about those we can not delete Renetto. 172.180.216.223 14:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Mentions in NY Times, NY Post, WSJ, Washington Post, BBC News. Notable --Pixelface 05:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep Poor sources. Artaxiad 21:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Mulitple non-trivial mentions by reliable sources such as the New York Times, Washington Post, BBC News and the Wall Street Journal. "Notability" increased since the last AfD in December 06, which is why I recreated article. --Oakshade 00:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.