Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious Science Youth Movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Religious Science Youth Movement

Religious Science Youth Movement (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. Non-notable group. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 06:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:NOTABILITY. No sources other than it's own site.Undeath (talk) 06:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

• Merge - Make it a subsection of Religious Science, doesn't pass WP:NOT on its own. Vrac (talk) 07:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - actually, the Religious Science article itself seems to have nothing but self references, and the sources for the inventor of the movement, Ernest Holmes, are also poor. I have to ask myself whether any of these articles pass the notability test. Gatoclass (talk) 07:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: per WP:NOTE, lack of any independent citations to establish notability. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 11:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:N, the group's own site does not satisfy WP:RS. meshach (talk) 16:33, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete — Wikipedia doesn't need to monitor what teenagers do on their religious camps... — EliasAlucard (Discussion · contribs) 03:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.