Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religion dispatches

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 00:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Religion dispatches

Religion dispatches (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Contested speedy. Non-notable website, just created in the past few weeks. No independent sources at all. Only relevant Google hits are for the site itself, the WP article and an assortment of bloggers (several of whom write for this site). Claims to be "the very first secular online magazine devoted to the scholarly analysis of religion for the general reader," a claim I find impossible to uphold or verify. It may be a notable web site someday, but it's not even close today. Possible self-promotion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 17:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. The site does not seem like it can be verified to be notable. Hazillow (talk) 17:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:V and thus does not assert WP:N, fails WP:NOT#LINK and looks very much like WP:SPAM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ros0709 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Does not meet notability guidelines. Dgf32 (talk) 19:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Of the three external links, one is the site itself, one is a site founded by the top-billed writer for this site and one is a writeup by a member of the advisory board for this site. 9Nak (talk) 11:16, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.