Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reitze Jonkman

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 18:38, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Reitze Jonkman

Non-notable; Google only pulls up a name dump and a few non-English educational-institute sites. Linuxbeak 20:32, May 9, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Google search of 326 hits; however, fame and importance are not the criterion for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Jimbo Wales - see Wikipedia_talk:Fame_and_importance#No. Rather the test for inclusion is whether it is valid material for an encyclopedia; that is information which is verifiable and which can be easily presented in an NPOV fashion. The information in this article is verifiable and is presented neutrally. The field of study is legitimate and academic - at least as valid an entry as a biography of a soap opera star. Stub template - appropriately categorised - should be added.--AYArktos 01:08, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, notability not established (WP:VAIN, WP:BIO). Radiant_* 07:50, May 11, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. Quale 05:57, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete- NN. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson 04:05, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.