Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reitsma

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 03:10, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Reitsma

Non-notable researcher. Google finds about 6 relevant hits. --InShaneee 00:53, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, notability not established. Mr Bound 02:09, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Page rank boosting and advertising for his blog. Vanity. (N.b. I didn't nowiki the websites, but someone should while the thing is on VfD.) Geogre 03:07, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. Jamyskis 07:20, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable and probably vanity. (I nowikified the links btw) the wub (talk) 08:19, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: Reitsma spelled backwards: Amstier. ~Mbsp
• Delete vanity Epolk 18:27, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn vanity. --Etacar11 23:14, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.