Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reisch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, perfectly valid redirect. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reisch

Reisch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Reisch isn't a German word, see Anchluss. Jimmy Fleischer (talk) 15:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, as Reisch is a reasonable misspelling of Reich. I restored the article's content, as it appears to have been unintentionally blanked when the AfD notice was placed. It's not actually a blank article. ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 15:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

• I don't know how the article got blanked, sorry about that. I don't quite agree with you, but the issue is identical to Anchluss, so I'd like to refer to that article's deletion talk instead of repeating myself. Jimmy Fleischer (talk)
• Speedy keep as redirect. This is a common misspelling of Reich. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 18:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.