Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:04, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regain

non-notable software PresN 06:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable. Michael 08:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No evidence of notability. --Ed (Edgar181) 11:33, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This entry provides no claims or links to nobility. Even the product's web page lists no links to press or reviews. Google is nearly imposible to use here as the name is a generic word. With the name and java, I was getting hits about recovery from the tsunami.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 19:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
• NO Delete there are a lot of pages in category search engine, desktop search that could be deleted also, some examples are: X1_Desktop_Search or X1 Enterprise Client, ISYS Search Software, Docco, Copernic Desktop Search, Beagle (software), Blinkx, Google Desktop, KAT Desktop Search Environment, Windows Desktop Search, Spotlight (software). The new attempt regain (software) to overcome the above criticism is blocked again. So I have no chance to improve this article!!! You should ask social tags like del.icio.us or blinklist instead of google ...

It is a project started 2004 in Germany running on the website of one of the biggest european mercantile concerns. We try here to inform the international community about this well structured project. Some (up to now mostly german) reviews / references are:

nuke webmaster forum, place 12 among top 25 downloads of the month, good ratings 1, 2, link to (brief) reviews1, 2, 3,

Comment - I had a quick look at the articles you listed, I would support a deletion on those - many are very advertise-ish and also do not seem to have any verifiable sources. To your claim you have no chance to improve this article - you have at minimum 5 days (more like 7 or 8 with the backlog). In regards to using del.icio.us and blinklist, I had never heard of them before now, and in reviewing the links provided, I get the feel they are blog-y/discussion group type sites rather then sites that fall under WP:RS.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 23:48, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable, borderline advert. -Royalguard11^Talk 01:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.