Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reflectoporn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn - reasonably sourced now. Will ^(talk) 13:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reflectoporn

Reflectoporn (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Disregarding the UD ref, we have one source, which makes the subject an nonnotable neologism Will ^(talk) 07:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Snopes is a reliable source. The term is attributed to another reliable source (although no reference is given). Seems like it has some degree of notability to me. JulesH 10:20, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

  Everything2 is user-content, therefore we can't verify such content. So is UD. Leaves us with one. (Snopes, which I will not deny is reliable) Articles need multiple sources. Will ^(talk) 10:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.