Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refined sugar and ritalin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Robert 04:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Refined sugar and ritalin

Was tagged prod, but original author removed it without any cited reason. Very unencyclopedic and unsourced.

• Delete Renata 02:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete POV and unencyclopaedic. -- Mithent 02:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - as per nomination. --Hurricane111 03:02, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Mithent Ruby 03:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination, POV. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 03:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, POV, OR, UE, and scare advocacy. Smerdis of Tlön 04:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unencyclopedic, POV, and unverified. Bad ideas 05:29, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. "You may come to this page thinking: What does sugar have to do with ritalin?" And you may say to yourself, This is totally POV. And you may say to yourself, This is original research. And you may ask yourself, Why the hell can't this be speedied? Per Smerdis of Tlön. Daniel Case 06:20, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Truly a once in a lifetime comment. Haikupoet 03:14, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. OK, crazy guy! Your original research doesn't belong here. Grandmasterka 11:57, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for all of the reasons stated above. I don't believe there is one factual statement in the entire thing. 202.174.144.202 13:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for above reasons. No sources, nothing verifiable, all opinion. And of course the title itself is tendentious. The article says nothing at all about ritalin, other than to compare the presumed evil effects. Can never be more than a point-of-view fork of other articles we now have which I can't be bothered to look up... Dpbsmith (talk) 16:53, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Smerdis Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 21:28, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- POV rant, nonnotable crankery, and an insult to anyone who's ever actually lived with ADD. Haikupoet 03:14, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per JzG. Blnguyen 03:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

I live with ADD, so you dont tell me that its an insult.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.