Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reduced armaments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, redirect creation is allowed if needed. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 02:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reduced armaments

Reduced armaments (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

A stub unexpanded since December 2007 and unlikely to be sustainable as a separate article. Topic is mentioned in Fourteen Points and if expansion is required, it would be better placed there. Rodhullandemu (Talk) 23:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. At best this article could expand to be a replication of material that is or should be in fourteen points, in which case it shouldn't exist as a standalone article. We could redirect this to fourteen points, but I'm not convinced this is a notable enough phrase to be a redirect. If others who are more familiar with the subject believe this is a useful redirect term, then redirect would be an appropriate outcome. Gwernol 23:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• Comment. If this is to be redirected then I think arms control would be a better target. I don't think this phrase is specific to the fourteen points. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete there's just not enough context there for it to be understood. Polly (Parrot) 19:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.