Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redstocking manifesto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. howcheng [ t • c • w • e ] 19:41, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Redstocking manifesto

Google yields 173 hits [1] But this article has been on the site for over a year so many mirrors. After sifting through the results, I notice most pages are mirrors. There are a few .edu pages that mention it as part of a syllabus. delete beceause there just isn't enough verifiable info.

Lotsofissues 07:20, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

• Wait. Maybe someone here with expertise on feminism related issues can find more info about this. I'm not sure if this is from the same group that's called "Redstockings," which is notable as a group which wrote the book Feminist Revolution, which was had a chapter on Gloria Steinem censored due to its exposure of her connections with the CIA. [2] Blackcats 09:29, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment I'm pretty sure that it was called Redstockings Manifesto, which was a very important feminist bit of kit. Move it there for accuracy sake (assuming I'm right, but I'm almost sure I am) then keep. Does need a rewrite though. Keresaspa 18:37, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Do agree with Blackcats. If possible, I shall come with further comments. --Bhadani 16:32, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Added an external link - now, I vote for Keep. I may try to give further inputs within next 2/ 3 days. --Bhadani 16:47, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. TestPilot 13:19, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.