Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redneck monday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--JForget 23:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Redneck monday

Redneck monday (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable activity/event held by a fraternity college group. Keb25 05:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete as plainly non-notable. No indication that this activity exists in any reliable sources. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Useight 06:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Canuck85 08:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Dang, delete this, y'all. NawlinWiki 14:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. WP:NOT#MADEUP. --Evb-wiki 16:53, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom and Useight. GlassCobra 17:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Do Not Delete per nom and useight. User:ChattingwithChapman This is a real interstate event, with cultural relevence in Louisiana —Preceding comment was added at 05:54, 19 October 2007 (UTC) — Chattingwithchapman (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
    • Being real is not enough to warrent an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia has minimum standards of notability and saying "Trust me, this is a real thing" is not enough. What we need to see is that the event has been covered EXTENSIVELY (that is, more than just proof of existance) in multiple, INDEPENDENT (that is, entirely unconnected to the event itself) coverage in RELIABLE sources (as defined by the reliable source guidelines), that is sources that are not self-published and exhibit some sort of editorial control like newspapers, journals, books, etc.) If this event has the cultural relevence you CLAIM that it does, than please furnish the sources to verify that it does. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 18:07, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.