Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redivorce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Redivorce

Article fails WP:WINAD; article is a protologism coined by author of the article and is thus not a candidate for Wiktionary. The author, User:Pilgrim27 has been inserting his own (unaccredited?) research into existing family-related articles or creating other new articles (e.g. Remarriage). -Merope 13:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per well-reasoned nomination. Do not transwiki unless attested from reliable sources. Just zis Guy you know? 15:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the prefix "re-" implies that you are doing something again. You don't need a dictionary entry for this any more than you need duplicate dictionary entries for the plural form of words. --Xrblsnggt 17:53, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.