Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red wings (Sexual Act)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by User:Allen3. Majorly _{(o rly?)} 16:50, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Red wings (Sexual Act)

Red_wings_(Sexual_Act) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

At best a definition; uncited, List of sexual slang terms cruft. Delete. ChronicallyUninspired 23:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:21, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Wikipedia is not a dictionary. MER-C 09:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - I'm not entirely sure how this entry is any different from all the others in Category:Sexual_slang (and yes, I'm completely aware of WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS). EliminatorJR ^Talk 22:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, despite the definition, this is a dic-def. Shenme 03:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, very limited usage by culture and region. WWGB 06:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
• Transwiki. If WP:WINAD is indeed applicable, then the appropriate action would have been to tag this for transwiki rather than deletion. So tagged. -- Black Falcon 08:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep - It definitely needs to be expanded, as it borders on a dicdef at the moment. However, the article is cited: note the last sentence, which specifically mentions that the term is used in the indicated manner in a specific publication. It's inline citation, but it is citation all the same. -- Y|yukichigai (_ramble argue ^check) 12:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.