Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red tailed black squirrel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Red tailed black squirrel

Red tailed black squirrel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Page does not refer to a species or subspecies of squirrel as no such taxon exists. No scientific name provided, so 100% verification of this is not really possible. This appears to be a page about a personal observation of melanistic Eastern Gray Squirrels with some reddish color on their tails if not an attempt at gibberish. Aranae 12:57, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete as nonsense, or at least a blatant violation of WP:NOR. Shalom ^Hello 14:09, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as OR. Doesn't seem to be pure nonsense, possibly something made up in school one day - but more likely just someone's personal observations. Arkyan • ^(talk) 15:03, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 15:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete it's original research. It wouldn't surprise me if it was nonsense. Acalamari 18:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, nonsense/OR. Jacek Kendysz 21:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Delete "This is the result of being fed peanuts?" Sounds like patent nonsense, or original research at best.--Kylohk 21:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
• strong delete misleading hoax as best I can tell. Debivort 06:09, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.