Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Oxx

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Ocatecir^T 07:56, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Red Oxx

Red Oxx (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable company, no claims of notability, no valid sources, was nominated for speedy deletion but the speedy tag was removed. Corvus cornix 01:29, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Not the slightest sign of notability, impact, or importance. The only news source is a one-sentence mention in a short newspaper interview where the interviewee says, yeah, I use their products. --Calton | Talk 01:59, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - I would respectfully note that your deletion rationale is no longer applicable; the article now mentions they have won awards and has more than a single reference. Addhoc 09:06, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

• No change in vote or rationale - the "awards" are trivial at best and the references are more grasping at straws than actual sources. --Calton | Talk 14:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep for now - adequate notability from awards combined with news coverage. Addhoc 08:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep for now, according to the article it has some notability (per the awards), but alone that's not enough. If more info can't be added the article should be deleted. *Cremepuff222* 01:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions. -- -- pb30<talk> 16:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.