Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Moon Theater

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was move the rewritten article to Redmoon Theater. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:36, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Red Moon Theater

The article is a sentence and a bundle of "please improve" templates. There's no indication as to where this theater is, and Google's total of 150 hits turns up theaters of this name in both new York and Chicago. Unless there is serious improvement, this needs to be clubbed on the head. Grutness...wha? 06:24, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Keep the rewrite, but move to Redmoon Theater. Good work, Rx StrangeLove Grutness...wha? 01:44, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

• Vote: Delete. Unless someone has some worthy input to add to this entry, there's no real need to keep a vague, one-sentence entry. Not at all encyclopedic. - JogCon 06:28, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Only the original article creator could know from this which entity is being referred to here; since they've not since updated it, it can safely be removed, no harm done.--cjllw | TALK 09:26, 2005 August 3 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable, probably ad, confusing as hell. --Merovingian (t) (c) 12:10, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Impossible to do anything else with. --Several Times 13:45, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
• Comment I found information on this theatre company readily available. It may be true that it has links to both New York and Chicago. If so, this make such a company doubly notable. This article needs to be researched and expanded. Hamster Sandwich 18:08, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as written there is no indication of notability. If expanded, that would be different. DES ^(talk) 20:11, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, but keep if notable or presents unfamiliar contexts in a reader-friendly way. — Stevey7788 (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and Comment I rewrote it, I think it's good enough to stay now. Turns out it's in Chicago and fairly interesting. Plus all those templates gave me a headache. Rx StrangeLove 05:07, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
  • It's actually one word so if it stays a redirect fixup is probably in order. Rx StrangeLove 05:13, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep after new edit and expansion by Rx StrangeLove. Nice work! Hamster Sandwich 23:14, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete notability not established, advertising. JamesBurns 04:41, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
  • As far as advertsing goes I have no connection to the Redmoon theater and in fact had never heard of it before I did the rewrite. Having said that, if you could let me know what there is about the article that stikes you as an avert I can try to adjust some of the wording. Thanks! Rx StrangeLove 13:35, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, potential for expansion has been demonstrated, so the reason for nomination no longer holds. arj 21:58, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, nice job Rx StrangeLove. I think that JamesBurns saw "high profile productions" in the first sentence, and when you're looking for advertising, it shows up clear on the radar. That then twists reading the rest of the article. -JJLeahy 23:30, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.