Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reconstruction (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot 05:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reconstruction (disambiguation)

del. Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages are for navigation between pages that would under certain circumstances could nave the same name. This page is a chaotic list of articles whose title use the word "reconstruction". At first I tried to clean it up, but soon noticed that I could not leave even two entries here, not to say three, as indicated by dab style guide. `'mikka (t) 01:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, I understand Mikka's concern, but I could see people forgetting what some of the things listed are and just searching for "reconstruction". Also, I don't think this page is harmful, since it is at a "(disambiguation)" name, and therefore not displacing an article that should be there. -- Kjkolb 02:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I've added a stub article for Reconstruction (criminal investigation). Grutness...wha? 03:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, reconstruction is a common term, so such an extensive disambiguation page is necessary. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:07, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Cordesat. αChimp ^laudare 04:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, the word "reconstruction" is used commonly in daily lives. It may refer to many topics from engineering to medical. Useful dab page. --Terence Ong _{(Chat | Contribs)} 10:27, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Disambiguation is for anything the user might type into a search box and hit "Go", not just for articles with the same exact title. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-07-26 12:29Z
• Keep per Cordesat. (I love the first history entry though:"sure im missing something" ). Yomangani 12:44, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but prune some of the less related items included. There appear to be an unusually high number of pages that should not be there for a disambiguation page. Erechtheus 18:54, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Kjkolb. --Elonka 00:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.