Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebelbots
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Rebelbots
Unreferenced, bordering on Patent nonsense, seem to be WP:MADEUP VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 01:05, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, I am planning to add more references and information shortly. Coah (talk) 06:12, 9 January 2008 (MST)
Neutral for now. Looks like a violation of WP:MADEUP, but I'd like ot give Coah a chance to work on it a little. Will check back in a few days. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 01:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Delete. The article is unreferenced, orphaned, and has no links to other articles. Ohmpandya (Talk) 01:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete unless reliable sources are provided then I'm going to have to go with it's made up. Oysterguitarist 03:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - recreation would be fine, as long as what's created isn't completely unsourced nonsense that looks pretty darn made-up. --Cheeser1 (talk) 05:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Deb (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. No references in reliable sources to pass WP:N. Gsearch tends to show it's not a violation of WP:MADEUP (plenty of sources do exist), but also tends to show that the information is unverifialbe (none of them are reliable). --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 16:42, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
