Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Bromwich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Celestianpower ^háblame 21:42, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rebecca Bromwich

Tagged for speedy, and almost an nn-bio, but the claims to publication are claims to notability in my book. Still, a clear delete. — brighterorange (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Probably vanity, not encyclopedic in any case. Gamaliel 19:03, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. What Gamaliel said. --Lukobe 19:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Getting published in peer reviewed journals is no big deal. Significance beyond this needs to be shown. Average Earthman 21:17, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as nn-bio. MCB 22:22, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete vanity page --Leo

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.