Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reasons for vandalism

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. — Trilobite (Talk) 23:28, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Reasons for vandalism

• Delete - bad joke --Mysidia (talk) 22:50, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to WP:VAND. -- < drini | ∂drini > 22:57, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. "Real encyclopedias should be like the ones they have at wal-mart" - oh man. I may frame that and put it on my user page. :) Fernando Rizo T/C 23:07, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV rant and OR. ManoaChild 23:11, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• For God's sake, how is this not a speedy candidate? Trollderella 23:23, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

  How would it be, under what criteria? --Mysidia (talk) 23:34, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

  • It's nonsense but not unsalvageably incoherent (uses complete sentences).. not a test page.. not pure vandalism.. not identical to a VFDed article afaik
  • Unknown if it was made by a banned user, no need to merge histories, no requested delete by original author, not a talk page
  • The context is ridiculous (but present), Not in a foreign language, not just a link, .. not about a real person.. it seems to fail all the criteria rather clearly
• Speedy but it made me smile. — Trilobite (Talk) 23:28, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.