Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realgm.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep Ryan Postlethwaite 15:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Realgm.com
Very thin and unreferenced assertion of notability here. Major claim seems to be that Marcus Allen supposedly contributes to the site. Alexa doesn't help. Probably doesn't meet WP:WEB. Suggest we delete. ··coelacan 02:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:WEB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Deletedoesn't meet criteria at WP:WEBStardust8212 02:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral - New sources seem to indicate notability though it seems the focus needs to switch to the real notable item which is the trade checker rather than the non-notable forum and vague claims of notability for the site itself. Stardust8212 20:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I can find no multiple, non-trivial, secondary sources. Fails WP:WEB. Sr13 (T|C) 03:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Needs sources that rise to WP:RS to establish noteworthiness. Quadzilla99 09:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I added sources. I could add more. Here is an example article by Marcus Allen [1] I think the main notability of the website is its trade checker. Raguv2000 20:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Raguv2000 has identified two independent sources where the subject of the article is specifically about RealGM. -- Whpq 16:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - [2] Notable, several other Wikipedia pages reference info from website.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
