Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real life

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close. Given that this is the nominator's first edit, and the phraseology of the nomination parrots several recent nominations of articles about fictional subjects, this is clearly a bad faith nomination. I remind editors not to disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. Uncle G (talk) 17:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Real life

Real life (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

In-universe notability is not established well enough to merit an article on the subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geese (talk • contribs) 16:32, 12 December 2007

• Speedy Keep, as the subject contains - in theory - all in-universe everything. I would think that notability of Life itself would be apparent. ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 21:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Seems a perfectly reasonable article to me. Abtract (talk) 00:31, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.