Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ready at Dawn Studios

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Linuxbeak | Talk 18:39, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ready at Dawn Studios

Ready at Dawn are a "small videogames development company" who have yet to publish their first project. Looks like the games industry version of garage bands. Pilatus 00:05, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Keep It was created from 2 major PC gaming studios, has a major-platform licensed game coming, has been noted in IGN, Gamespy and Gamespot, and took E3 awards from the latter two this year. See[1]. --CastAStone 00:45, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. The upcoming game IMHO makes it notable enough, because it's been previewed (and so does actually exist and isn't vapourware). Weak, because, well, it's just one game.--inksT 00:56, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, as the game they will release, Daxter, it's notable enough. Carioca 02:07, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per above keepers. Kappa 02:08, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Mildly notable. Banes 09:35, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment This one is really borderline... Blizzard connection confers slight notability, but until the game comes out, I don't really see much of a case here for inclusion.--Isotope23 15:41, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak keep - CHAIRBOY (☎) 17:00, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  • keep please this is important and verifiable we do not have any reason to erase this Yuckfoo 00:07, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep as per CastAStone. the wub "?!" 23:14, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.