Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reading Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Coredesat 04:21, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reading Entertainment

Reading Entertainment (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Brought in from speedy, where it was tagged as being a spam page. Article was created in 2005, and while it is very definitely promotional in tone, this company may be notable in Australia and New Zealand. Procedural nomination Resolute 04:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Canley 08:43, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep One of the larger cinema operators in NZ, and certainly notable as a niche third player in the Australian market. Enough reliable sources on gnews search [1] Recurring dreams 09:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable as per Recurring Dreams. I have deleted a large copyvio/advertising section that had been added by an anon.--Melburnian 09:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, I must say I've never seen one of these cinemas myself, but after a brief look they seem like a notable enough company. Tone is not unreasonable after Melburnian's edits. Lankiveil 10:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC).
• Keep - one of the largest cinema chains in Australia. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 12:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.