Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reachwell Software Services Private

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete of everything but Sierra Atlantic per copyright concerns and notability. Yanksox 15:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reachwell Software Services Private

Non Notable company. Google hits only give the said company's links. No mention of the company in the Indian media. I am also nominating these other companies for the same reason.

  • Keep Sierra Atlantic - decent press coverage and major expansion plans here and recent business win here. BlueValour 20:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Persistent Systems - USA, India and Japan offices with significant outside investment here. BlueValour 20:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete QualEx Systems - small company (70 employees). NN. BlueValour 20:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Reachwell Software Services Private - limited press coverage. NN. BlueValour 20:44, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Persistent Systems - There are about 25 entries from July 06 where Persistent is cited in the media. The Company has 2600 employees. here.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.175.207 (talk • contribs)
    • Comment Keep Persistent and Sierra per BlueValour --Ageo020 03:37, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete QualEx Systems - POV / advertising, no content, not notable. Mrvolvo 19:42, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 23:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete Reachwell Software Services Private. No independent sources, no evidence of serious press coverage, indistinguishable from 1,000 other nn small software outfits. Robert A.West (Talk) 06:41, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete QualEx Systems. Written in first person: need I say more? OK, same comments as Reachwell. Robert A.West (Talk) 06:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Persistent Systems. Publicity agent who wrote the article was at least clueful enough to rephrase to third person. Forbes' account of this company looks impressive until you think about it -- 700 release cycles and wrote some code for 200 "industry-leading" products. My last dinner party could claim more nearly as much. Robert A.West (Talk) 06:58, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep Sierra Atlantic. Reasonable publicity, some marginally-noteworthy industry impact. Robert A.West (Talk) 07:36, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Perhaps it would be advisable to relist each one separately. Eusebeus 12:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment - no, please no, I really don't want to go through such a boring bunch of companies again :-) Let's try and make some clear decisions and then forget them! BlueValour 15:37, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment — QualEx Systems has just been tagged copyvio - Glen 06:08, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment — Reachwell is also a copyvio guys. I have left the AfD tags on incase they are not deleted due to copyvio, in which case the outcome here is relevant. Thanks - Glen 06:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC) - Glen 06:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.