Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReTorrent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. JIP | Talk 10:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ReTorrent

Original research from [1]. At best, NN per Google. JLaTondre 19:22, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete This is an article about a nn feature in a bittorrent client --Ruby 20:17, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
• Copyvio, probably. Delete either way. Stifle 11:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

• Copyright status is problematic. The website it's from states that it uses any "free" license (i.e. CreativeCommons). The any and i.e. are a bit contradictory. Also, copyright review will probably result in the obtaining of permission vs. deletion. Not that I disagree with you sending it to copyvio, I'd just rather see it get deleted here. -- JLaTondre 23:20, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.