Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReCycle (program)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Eluchil404 00:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] ReCycle (program)

ReCycle (program) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY, see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reason components Hu12 09:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless reviews etc conferring notability are found Corpx 16:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless third-party publications are cited to establish notability. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep two separate, reliable third-party publications have now been cited - one review, one in a 6th edition book on recording - and notability confirmed--Mrtombullen 21:41, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep I've never jumped in to an afd, but since I used Recycle a few times and found the AFD by looking it up out of curiousity, I think it should stay.

[1] [2] [3] [4] --Torchwood Who? 23:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep per sources above. Leibniz 13:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.